<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing 2 Tracks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandonplank.com/site/testing-2-tracks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandonplank.com/site/testing-2-tracks/</link>
	<description>minimalism + sound</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rams</title>
		<link>http://brandonplank.com/site/testing-2-tracks/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>rams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonplank.com/site/?p=357#comment-393</guid>
		<description>BP:

rams from nyc here. Filler #2 caught my attn of the two. A solid track for sure. If I were to make it better (which I can&#039;t because I&#039;m not a producer, just a techno listener/fan), I&#039;d drop a fat, deep bass line about 2/3 or 3/4 of the way thru, and trim a little off the top-end at the same time to fatten it up a bit.

Love your work, waiting impatiently for aug 09 promo ??!?!

-rams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP:</p>
<p>rams from nyc here. Filler #2 caught my attn of the two. A solid track for sure. If I were to make it better (which I can&#8217;t because I&#8217;m not a producer, just a techno listener/fan), I&#8217;d drop a fat, deep bass line about 2/3 or 3/4 of the way thru, and trim a little off the top-end at the same time to fatten it up a bit.</p>
<p>Love your work, waiting impatiently for aug 09 promo ??!?!</p>
<p>-rams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
